yahoo - 3/18/2026 12:08:35 PM - GMT (+2 )
Since March Madness became part of the sports vernacular, the NCAA Tournament bracket pool has become a familiar exercise. Broadly speaking, participants come from two main categories. There are the more casual fans who only pay attention to men’s college hoops around tourney time. They’ll do a modicum of research but will for the most part rely on name recognition and seeding to fill out their brackets.
Then there are the diehards, those who follow the sport from November onward in hopes of accumulating more knowledge for when the bracket is finally unveiled.
March Madness bold predictions: Best upset picks, Final Four sleeper
This is for the latter group, the ones who have been watching certain teams all season and are all too aware just how wildly unpredictable they can be. These are the teams that will cause self-described bracket experts the most angst as they consider their picks. They’re the teams that have the talent necessary for a deep run, even perhaps capable of sending a No. 1 packing. But they are also inconsistent enough that they’re just as likely to flame out in the first weekend. As you consider what to do with these eight teams, all we can say is, good luck.
KansasThe Jayhawks’ history with Bill Self at the helm suggests their Final Four potential shouldn’t be dismissed. Their Big 12 results this season were a mixed bag, however, with impressive wins against Arizona and Iowa State mingled with ugly losses to bottom-tier finishers West Virginia and Arizona State. KU’s inconsistency isn’t entirely attributable to Darryn Peterson’s inconsistent health status, though that is certainly part of the story. Flory Bidunga can be dominant at times and invisible at others, and Melvin Council Jr. can be sizzling hot or ice cold.
PurdueThe Boilermakers were voted No. 1 in the preseason poll. At the start of the campaign and again at the end they looked the part. In between, however, they presented as a middle-of-the-pack Big Ten squad, a curious situation for a team with several multi-year starters. When Purdue struggled, there were issues at both ends of the floor, at times disinterested on defense and making bad decisions with the ball. Did the Boilermakers figure things out at the Big Ten tournament, or will there be a relapse at an inopportune time?
REGION BREAKDOWNS, PREDICTIONS: East | South | Midwest | West
PRINTABLE BRACKET: Fill out your picks for NCAA Tournament pools
ArkansasThere are many reasons to back the Razorbacks in their region. Their SEC tournament title would seem to indicate they’re heating up at the right time, and coach John Calipari has taken his share of teams to the final weekend. But their path to the SEC championship was cleared for them a bit as they didn’t have to face Florida or Alabama, and as good as Darius Acuff Jr. has been over the last few weeks, only a few teams have gone the distance with a talented freshman lead guard.
Putting the Bulldogs in your Sweet 16 is usually a safe choice, but how far to take this group beyond that is tough to predict, especially since they’ll be matched up with equally volatile Purdue if the seeds hold. Gonzaga always plays a challenging non-conference schedule by necessity, and the results this season were mixed. The team defense is usually sound, but the Zags might not have enough perimeter scoring options to compensate when Graham Ike inevitably has to contend with bigger post players.
ConnecticutA few weeks ago, a complete domination of St. John’s had the Huskies on course for a top seed and well positioned for a shot at a third national title in four years. Since then, there was a loss to Marquette and a payback defeat to the Red Storm in the Big East final, not to mention numerous other uneven outings and more Danny Hurley meltdowns. It’s quite the conundrum when contemplating just how far to trust the Huskies in their extremely loaded regional. When Solo Ball is on UConn can beat anyone, but when he isn’t the rest of his game suffers.
AlabamaThe Crimson Tide were going to be on this wildcard list even before the news of Aden Holloway’s legal troubles came out. Regardless, Alabama’s feast-or-famine approach at the 3-point arc can lead all the way to the Final Four as it did a couple years ago. This year’s version lacks rim protection, so the team has to rely on ball pressure to generate takeaways, a high-energy approach that might not be sustainable in the quick turnaround setting of the tournament. And missing one of their best players on the eve of the event may be too tough to manage.
IllinoisAt the start of February, the Fighting Illini were riding a 12-game winning streak with a path to a No. 1 seed in sight with veteran guard Kylan Boswell returning from injury. But then Illinois went 4-5 down the stretch, with four of the five losses coming in overtime. All the defeats were against other tournament teams, but their troubling inability to make winning plays in close games has to be on everyone’s mind as the Big Dance tips off.
VirginiaWhile seeing the Cavaliers on the bracket is not new, this year’s version is constructed quite differently than the Tony Bennett teams of recent vintage. First and foremost, fans will see the team play at a much faster tempo under first-year coach Ryan Odom. But the real mystery with UVa is just how they’ll stack up against teams from other power leagues. The Cavs handled most of their competition in the watered-down ACC, but aside from a win against Texas there wasn’t much of note on their non-conference resume entering the postseason.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: March Madness bracket busters: Eight top seeds to avoid picking
read more


